Old Version
Cover Story

Pharma Chameleon

Chinese drugmakers are adapting to new conditions, licensing cutting-edge treatments worldwide, undercutting rivals on price and eyeing a bigger slice of the global market

By Wu Jin , Shi Ruoxiao Updated Dec.1

Medical products are displayed in a booth at PharmChina, a major exhibition for China’s pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, May 22, 2025. Now in its 90th year, the exhibition attracted companies from more than 30 countries and regions around the world (Photo by VCG)

Chinese biopharma firms are going global fast. Over the first eight months of 2025, their out-licensing innovative drug transactions reached US$87.4 billion, well exceeding the US$55.4 billion recorded for 2024, according to an October report by the China National Pharmaceutical Industry Information Center (CPHIIC).  

Out-licensing allows one pharma company to let another use its intellectual property, under specific terms, usually in exchange for payment. An example might be a smaller company that has developed a new drug, but licenses it to a bigger company to complete later development and trials and bring it to market.  

As the number and quality of novel drugs developed by Chinese companies have increased, they have attracted the attention of multinational firms. Last year, China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved 48 first-in-class indigenous drugs, eight more than 2023 and the highest in five years.  

First-in-class refers to drugs that feature a new and unique way to treat a disease. In the first half of 2025 alone, 41 first-in-class drugs received marketing approval, only seven short of the 2024 total.  

While out-licensing seems to be the best option for Chinese pharma firms eager to monetize innovation, many are now cooperating with multinational giants in more sophisticated and diverse ways to strengthen their global presence.  

With huge market demand and growing competitiveness, Chinese drugmakers inspire confidence in their global prospects. However, breaking into the first-in-class tier on the world stage will take time and experience. 

Chic and Cheap 
“Over the past few years, an increasing number of Chinese pharma firms have participated in international symposiums where they’ve dominated discussions on Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb),” said Wang Jinsong, founder, chairman and CEO of Harbour BioMed, established in Shanghai in 2016. ADCs are targeted cancer therapies, while BsAbs are antibodies that can bind to two different targets at once.  

According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 89 out of 184 research studies on ADC “pipelines” (a term for compounds under development by pharmaceutical companies) presented at its annual conference in Chicago this May were from China. Chinese pharma firms released 34 BsAb findings, accounting for about 49 percent of the research projects unveiled at the conference.  

China’s first-in-class pipelines now account for 24 percent of the global total, second only to the US. Since 2020, it has ranked first worldwide in the number of new drugs entering into phase I clinical trials each year, Tianfeng Securities reported in July.  

In July, Biokin Pharmaceutical from Sichuan Province became the first company in the world to complete phase-III clinical trials for a BsAb to treat nasopharyngeal cancer.  

“China’s pharma sector has strategically transitioned from fast-follow production to first-in-class innovations and global cooperation,” Liu Tianran, a partner at Singapore-based Vertex Ventures, told NewsChina.  

Meanwhile, Chinese novel drugs are much cheaper than global ones.  

“In some mature medical areas, innovative drugs from Chinese firms can cost 80 percent less, take 70 percent less time in the R&D cycle and display at least 80 percent efficacy compared to their US counterparts,” Tang Jun, founder of the biotech consultancy InScienceWeTrust BioAdvisory, told NewsChina.  

Global pharma giants, facing a looming “patent cliff,” are hungry for new drugs. The CPHIIC report in October noted that patents for drugs generating more than US$180 billion annual sales revenue are due to expire in 2027 and 2028. These factors make China’s novel drugs appealing. Wang Jinsong said his workdays often stretch past midnight because of his international partners across different time zones.  

His company, Harbour Biomed, which develops antibody therapeutics for cancers and immune diseases, has completed 17 overseas out-licensing deals, including a deal in June with Japan’s Otsuka worth nearly US$700 million.  

According to Dealforma, a US-based database platform for the biopharma sector, about 30 percent of assets licensed by multinational pharma giants in 2024 came from Chinese companies.  

Approximately half of up-front payments for cancer therapy pipelines have shifted from US biotech companies to Chinese ones, Tang Jun said.  

By 2024, Chinese out-licensing deals had hit US$150 billion, with 18 drugs gaining overseas market authorization, according to a report jointly published in March by Tsinghua University’s Research Institute of Drug Regulatory Sciences and biotech data provider PharmCube. Several Chinese novel drugs had even outperformed foreign ones in clinical comparisons. 

‘Sprout Sales’ 
���[Drug] companies in China have refined a shrewd money-saving strategy: engineer novel drugs at a fraction of the cost borne by American firms, then license or sell them to US drugmakers while they are still early in development,” wrote Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration, in a Washington Post opinion article on September 22, 2025. 
 
Analysts note that out-licensing early-stage drugs shifts the risk of later-stage failure to foreign buyers and reflects that R&D data from China is now more accepted overseas.    

However, this strategy, dubbed “selling sprouts” in the industry, has been raising questions. In November 2023, Guangdong-based BioTheus sold its anti-lung cancer BNT327 to German company BioNTech for a US$55 million up-front payment and around US$1 billion in milestone and marketing commissions. A year later, BioNTech acquired BioTheus in a share swap valued at US$950 million.  

Then, in June, US pharma firm BMS and BioNTech struck a US$11.1 billion deal for the same drug as its core asset, creating a nearly US$9 billion premium.  

The case is not an exception. In August 2023, Hengrui Pharma from Jiangsu Province sold its respiratory monoclonal antibody pipeline SHR1905 to US firm One Bio, with an upfront payment of US$25 million. When UK giant GSK acquired One Bio months later, renaming it Aiolos Bio for its core asset AIO-001 (formerly SHR-1905), the deal reached US$1.4 billion.  

“Chinese pharma firms seem to profit handsomely from these business development deals, but they often lose out by abandoning their products’ far greater potential value,” said Chu Lei, a research fellow at Healthcare Executive, a Beijing-based online platform that tracks listed pharmaceutical firms, told NewsChina.  

One of the reasons is lack of experience. “Many Chinese companies neither fully understand their own pipelines nor study their overseas target markets deeply enough, leaving them at a disadvantage when they negotiate out-licensing deals,” Zhou Shuhua, chief analyst of Citeline, a UK-based pharmaceutical and med-tech think tank, told NewsChina.  

But survival pressures play an even bigger role. In 2015, China launched sweeping reforms in the healthcare sector to spur innovation. Policies streamlining the approval process, expanding financing for startups and upgrading quality standards for novel drugs fueled massive R&D investment.  

Capital flooded in, especially after Hong Kong established a new stock market board in 2018 to encourage tech startups to raise funds. The Shanghai Stock Exchange launched a similar board called the STAR Market in 2019. Chinese companies can choose to be listed on one or both.  

“With the availability of quick money, overlapping pipelines were created, driven by capital flows,” Zhou said.  

Take the anticancer PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, for example. In 2021 alone, 150 pharma firms registered more than 600 clinical trials for these medicines, nearly 200 of which reached phase III, according to db.yaozhi.com, which tracks clinical trials.  

However, investors soon lost patience. Returns were slow due to public hospitals’ limited access to innovative drugs, which is crucial for steady cash flow, and the glut of similar products. According to the Tianfeng Securities report, pharma companies raised only US$4.2 billion on the primary capital market in 2024, down from the US$16 billion peak in 2021.  

An industry insider said that his company spent 2 billion yuan (US$281m) over 11 years on developing a new drug, plus 300 million yuan (US$42.1m) each year for further trials, but annual sales never exceeded 200 million yuan (US$28.1m). With revenue barely covering personnel costs, they had “no option but to depend on external funds,” the insider said.  

China’s low operating costs is another advantage. “China has an army of relatively low-paid scientists able to churn out new compounds,” Gottlieb wrote in his September article. Clinical trials in China and Australia are also much cheaper than in the US and Europe, according to Clinical Leader, a USbased clinical trial consultancy. It says that in China’s case, faster recruitment and streamlined regulations also add to its advantages.  

In 2023, Chinese pharma firms netted more than 21 billion yuan (US$2.95b) in up-front payments through license-out, nearly doubling revenue raised by IPOs, according to PharmCube that same year.  

In 2024, Chinese firms signed 90 overseas licensing deals worth over US$50 billion, Wang Xiaoning, director-general of the Department of Drug Price and Tendering Procurement under the NHSA, said at a July press conference. 

Doctors provide free medical consultations at a local community, Pingliang, Gansu Province, April 11, 2024 (Photo by VCG)

Confidence and Barriers 
Market confidence in overseas ventures for China’s novel drugs has strengthened, and for good reason.  

Policies continue to support innovation. On September 28, the State Council, China’s cabinet, announced stricter rules for clinical trials, particularly for academic and ethics reviews, to improve quality and credibility.  

International consultancy KPMG stressed that China’s “aging population is expected to escalate demand for healthcare solutions” in its April report “China Life Sciences Sector Overview and Outlook.”  

As Chinese pharma companies grew stronger, they began to provide end-to-end services, from drug discovery to manufacturing, often as outsourced partners for multinationals. By integrating into the global pharma supply chain, China has built its own full-fledged system, the Tianfeng Securities report said. “We now have plenty of options to get our medicines produced, with or without [overseas] cooperation,” Wang Jinsong said.  

The KPMG report added that as Chinese firms mature, they attract more overseas investors and enjoy greater options for partnership.  

In the past, Chinese companies often got only up-front payment from their “sprouts” sales, without much larger follow-up milestone earnings. This has changed. On October 12, Biokin announced an upcoming US$250 million milestone payment from US company Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) due to clinical trial progress on their jointly developed drug for breast cancer. Another milestone came when Shanghai’s Dizal Pharma won approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its first-in-class oral lung cancer drug, Sunvozertinib.  

Harbour BioMed also sold a 9.15 percent stake, worth US$105 million, to AstraZeneca in March, expanding their partnership to shareholding.  

Chinese firms are also adopting a new cooperative model called “NewCo,” allowing domestic drug makers to bring in foreign capital and management teams through newly created joint ventures.  

For instance, when Hengrui Pharma sold a GLP-1 receptor pipeline for obesity and type-2 diabetes to US firm Hercules in May, it acquired a 19.9 percent stake in addition to upfront and milestone payments, making earnings more sustainable.  

To become leading multinational conglomerates, Chinese drugmakers must build capacity in clinical trials across the world and expand marketing networks to reach end users, Chu told NewsChina.  

But challenges remain, as access to clinical resources in major hospitals across the US and Europe can be difficult to navigate and marketing networks are tightly controlled by established pharma firms.  

Moreover, the US remains wary of China’s biotech rise. Though the 100 percent tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump on September 25 will not impact most Chinese out-licensing deals, as they mostly involve early-stage development, concerns persist. “Democrats and Republicans have called America’s reliance on China for medicines a national security vulnerability,” The New York Times reported on September 10.  

Domestically, reforms are needed to boost access to public hospitals covered by medical insurance, and regulations need to be revised to allow frontline doctors to further engage with pharma innovation. Some in China also worry that overseas out-licensing could lead to the loss of valuable intellectual property.  

“The Chinese pharmaceutical industry can definitely scale up to be multinational conglomerates, but the process will take time,” Chu said.

Technicians check equipment at a Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals factory, Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, December 13, 2021 (Photo by VCG)

Print